欢迎来到麦多课文档分享! | 帮助中心 海量文档,免费浏览,给你所需,享你所想!
麦多课文档分享
全部分类
  • 标准规范>
  • 教学课件>
  • 考试资料>
  • 办公文档>
  • 学术论文>
  • 行业资料>
  • 易语言源码>
  • ImageVerifierCode 换一换
    首页 麦多课文档分享 > 资源分类 > PDF文档下载
    分享到微信 分享到微博 分享到QQ空间

    IEEE 1584 INT 1-3-2008 en Guide for Performing Arc-Flash Hazard Calculations《IEEE Std 1584 -2002用IEEE标准解释文件 电弧闪光危害计算实施用IEEE指南》.pdf

    • 资源ID:1248307       资源大小:75.49KB        全文页数:4页
    • 资源格式: PDF        下载积分:10000积分
    快捷下载 游客一键下载
    账号登录下载
    微信登录下载
    二维码
    微信扫一扫登录
    下载资源需要10000积分(如需开发票,请勿充值!)
    邮箱/手机:
    温馨提示:
    如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
    如需开发票,请勿充值!如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
    支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付    微信扫码支付   
    验证码:   换一换

    加入VIP,交流精品资源
     
    账号:
    密码:
    验证码:   换一换
      忘记密码?
        
    友情提示
    2、PDF文件下载后,可能会被浏览器默认打开,此种情况可以点击浏览器菜单,保存网页到桌面,就可以正常下载了。
    3、本站不支持迅雷下载,请使用电脑自带的IE浏览器,或者360浏览器、谷歌浏览器下载即可。
    4、本站资源下载后的文档和图纸-无水印,预览文档经过压缩,下载后原文更清晰。
    5、试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。

    IEEE 1584 INT 1-3-2008 en Guide for Performing Arc-Flash Hazard Calculations《IEEE Std 1584 -2002用IEEE标准解释文件 电弧闪光危害计算实施用IEEE指南》.pdf

    1、IEEE Std 1584-2002_InterpretationIEEE Standards Interpretation for IEEE Std 1584 -2002IEEE Guide for Performing Arc-Flash Hazard Calculations Copyright 2008 by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. 3 Park Avenue New York, New York 10016-5997 USA All Rights Reserved. This is an

    2、interpretation of IEEE Std 1584-2002. Interpretations are issued to explain and clarify the intent of a standard and are not intended to constitute an alteration to the original standard or to supply consulting information. Permission is hereby granted to download and print one copy of this document

    3、. Individuals seeking permission to reproduce and/or distribute this document in its entirety or portions of this document must contact the IEEE Standard Department for the appropriate license. Use of the information contained in this document is at your own risk.IEEE Standards Department Copyrights

    4、 and Permissions 445 Hoes Lane Piscataway, New Jersey 08855-1331, USADecember 2008Interpretation #1Is there an accepted practice or method in which incident energies can be lowered, therefore lowering the PPE category? http:/standards.ieee.org/reading/ieee/interp/1584-2002.html (1 of 4) 2009/01/06 9

    5、:09:11 PMIEEE Std 1584-2002_InterpretationInterpretation Response #1The answer is IEEE Std 1584-2002 does not address practices or methods of lowering the incident energy because it would be outside the scope of this edition. However, the question is of great interest to users of the Guide and it wi

    6、ll be addressed in the next edition. In the meantime, information on the subject is available from IEEE papers presented at the 2002 and 2003 PCIC Conferences. The papers are available in the PCIC record. The next opportunities to learn how people are solving this problem will be at the 2004 IAS Ele

    7、ctrical Safety Workshop and at the 2004 IAS PCIC Conference. There are, in fact, many ways to reduce incident energy. Interpretation #2An interpretation of IEEE Std 1584-2002 “Guide for Performing Arc-Flash Hazard Calculations“ is requested. In 5.1, 7.5, and 9.1 the criteria for the model for incide

    8、nt energy calculations includes “Bolted fault current in the range of 700A-106,000A.“ What is the significance of “700A,“ the lower limit of the range. Is there a particular reason why it is 700A, and not 600A, 500A, 400A, etc.?Several arc flash studies are currently being conducted in which the bol

    9、ted fault current for a few busses is lower than 700A. The software tools used to conduct the studies make it clear that this fault level is outside of the range of IEEE 1584 and leave it at that. How to treat these situations is uncertain. Can it be concluded, for example, that incident energy is l

    10、ow and would be always be classed as NFPA 70E 2004, Category 0 (i.e. less than 2.00 cal/cm2)? Interpretation Response #2 The model in the Guide was empirically derived, i.e., it was developed through statistical analysis of test data. This type of model has no defined accuracy outside the range of t

    11、he test data and, in fact, it can give obviously incorrect calculation results outside the stated range of the model the lower limit of 700A is based.In answer to your question on applications where the bolted fault current is below 700A, note that the Guide offers two models. The Lee Model can be a

    12、pplied outside the range of the empirically derived model. Note also that Annex B suggests a limit to arc duration may be applied, depending on the application.http:/standards.ieee.org/reading/ieee/interp/1584-2002.html (2 of 4) 2009/01/06 9:09:11 PMIEEE Std 1584-2002_InterpretationRecognize that th

    13、e Guide is just a guide and engineering judgment must be applied when performing an arc flash hazard calculations study. Interpretation #3 Topic: Accuracy of material in IEEE 1584-2002 and amendment IEEE 1584a-2004 Relevant Clauses: Section 9.5 and Equation 5.3(4) Section 9.5 states: “Two grounding

    14、classes are applied in the equations considered, as follows: a) Ungrounded, which included ungrounded, high-resistance grounding and low-resistance grounding. b) Solidly grounded.” We have a system with a resistance grounded secondary on a 750kVA transformer. In line with the statements above, the i

    15、ncident energy level determined by our software tools for the secondary side is significantly higher (about 30%) for resistance grounding than the scenario where the transformer is modeled as having solid grounding. This seems to be contrary to statements in other standards concerning resistance gro

    16、unding as referenced below. Perhaps the key consideration is phase-to-ground fault versus three-phase fault. Clarification would be appreciated, since it would seem that solidly grounding the secondary would improve arc flash hazards as per above, while resistance grounding is recommended below. IEE

    17、E Std 141-1993 (Red Book) section 7.2.4 states “A safety hazard exists for solidly grounded systems from the severe flash, arc burning, and blast hazard from any phase-to-ground fault.“ For this reason, IEEE recommends resistance grounding. IEEE Std 142-1991 (Green Book) section 1.4.3 states “The re

    18、asons for limiting the current by resistance grounding may be one or more of the following: 1) To reduce burning and melting effects in faulted electric equipment, such as switchgear, transformers, cables, and rotating machines. 2) To reduce mechanical stresses in circuits and apparatus carrying fau

    19、lt currents. 3) To reduce electric-shock hazards to personnel caused by stray ground-fault currents in the ground return path. 4) To reduce the arc blast or flash hazard to personnel who may have accidentally caused or who happen to be in close proximity to the ground fault. 5) To reduce the momenta

    20、ry line-voltage dip occasioned by the clearing of a ground fault. 6) To secure control of transient over-voltages while at the same time avoiding the shutdown of a faulty circuit on the occurrence of the first ground fault (high resistance grounding). http:/standards.ieee.org/reading/ieee/interp/158

    21、4-2002.html (3 of 4) 2009/01/06 9:09:11 PMIEEE Std 1584-2002_InterpretationIEEE Std 141-1993 (Red Book) section 7.2.2 states “There is no arc flash hazard, as there is with solidly grounded systems, since the fault current is limited to approximately 5A.“ Interpretation Response #3I agree with your

    22、assessment that IEEE std 1584 seems to be contrary to statements in the other standards you cited, but appearances sometimes deceive. Each statement you quote from a standard is correct and your two calculations show the difference in results that I would expect.The IEEE 1584 statement is based on t

    23、hree-phase testing with ungrounded and grounded systems and analysis of the results. This is because it is recognized that arc power is higher in three phase faults than in line-to-line or ground faults and single phase faults often escalate to become three-phase faults. IEEE 1584 considers only tha

    24、t worst case. The other two standards you quote are discussing only ground faults, based on the fact that most faults begin as ground faults. If fault current can be limited, the fault is not likely to escalate to become a three phase fault. Arc fault energy will be quite small by comparison to the

    25、three phase fault case. However, even with resistance grounding, a three phase fault is still possible and so it must be considered when calculating incident energy. Back to Available IEEE Standards Interpretations Online Copyright IEEE-SA Contact IEEE-SA For questions or comments, please contact the IEEE-SA Webmaster. http:/standards.ieee.org/reading/ieee/interp/1584-2002.html (4 of 4) 2009/01/06 9:09:11 PM


    注意事项

    本文(IEEE 1584 INT 1-3-2008 en Guide for Performing Arc-Flash Hazard Calculations《IEEE Std 1584 -2002用IEEE标准解释文件 电弧闪光危害计算实施用IEEE指南》.pdf)为本站会员(livefirmly316)主动上传,麦多课文档分享仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文档分享(点击联系客服),我们立即给予删除!




    关于我们 - 网站声明 - 网站地图 - 资源地图 - 友情链接 - 网站客服 - 联系我们

    copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
    备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1 

    收起
    展开