欢迎来到麦多课文档分享! | 帮助中心 海量文档,免费浏览,给你所需,享你所想!
麦多课文档分享
全部分类
  • 标准规范>
  • 教学课件>
  • 考试资料>
  • 办公文档>
  • 学术论文>
  • 行业资料>
  • 易语言源码>
  • ImageVerifierCode 换一换
    首页 麦多课文档分享 > 资源分类 > PDF文档下载
    分享到微信 分享到微博 分享到QQ空间

    REG NASA-LLIS-1804--2007 Lessons Learned Design and Analysis of Electronic Circuits for Worst Case Environments and Part Variations.pdf

    • 资源ID:1019298       资源大小:18.56KB        全文页数:5页
    • 资源格式: PDF        下载积分:10000积分
    快捷下载 游客一键下载
    账号登录下载
    微信登录下载
    二维码
    微信扫一扫登录
    下载资源需要10000积分(如需开发票,请勿充值!)
    邮箱/手机:
    温馨提示:
    如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
    如需开发票,请勿充值!如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
    支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付    微信扫码支付   
    验证码:   换一换

    加入VIP,交流精品资源
     
    账号:
    密码:
    验证码:   换一换
      忘记密码?
        
    友情提示
    2、PDF文件下载后,可能会被浏览器默认打开,此种情况可以点击浏览器菜单,保存网页到桌面,就可以正常下载了。
    3、本站不支持迅雷下载,请使用电脑自带的IE浏览器,或者360浏览器、谷歌浏览器下载即可。
    4、本站资源下载后的文档和图纸-无水印,预览文档经过压缩,下载后原文更清晰。
    5、试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。

    REG NASA-LLIS-1804--2007 Lessons Learned Design and Analysis of Electronic Circuits for Worst Case Environments and Part Variations.pdf

    1、Best Practices Entry: Best Practice Info:a71 Committee Approval Date: 2007-10-30a71 Center Point of Contact: JPLa71 Submitted by: David OberhettingerSubject: Design and Analysis of Electronic Circuits for Worst Case Environments and Part Variations Practice: Design all circuits to perform within def

    2、ined tolerance limits over a given mission lifetime while experiencing the worst possible variations of electronic piece parts and environments.Abstract: Preferred Practice for Design & Test. Worst Case Analysis (WCA) is a uniform, disciplined, systematic approach to circuit analysis that determines

    3、 whether each circuit and each assembly meets its specified electrical performance attributes over the most extreme but realizable combinations of part variation sources. The lack of a structured WCA activity jeopardizes the integrity of the initial circuit design over the project life cycle.Program

    4、s that Certify Usage: Not applicable: this document is not a lesson learned, but rather one of the Reliability Preferred Practices that were moved to the LLIS. Since the narrative is not based upon an event, there is no issue of a “recurrence“ to control.Center to Contact for Information: JPLImpleme

    5、ntation Method: This lesson learned is based on Reliability Practice number PD-ED-1212, from NASA Technical Memorandum 4322A, Reliability Preferred Practices for Design and Test. Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-Benefit: The practice o

    6、f designing and analyzing electronic circuits for worst case environments and part variations maximizes the probability of mission success by assuring that all assemblies meet their mission electrical performance requirements at all times. Implementation Method: Worst Case Analysis (WCA) evaluates f

    7、actors that may cause hardware to degrade or perform out-of-specification based upon a variety of input factors. For electronic circuits, the analysis generally includes the effects of temperature, initial tolerances, aging, radiation, and other effects as appropriate. The analyst derives part param

    8、eter variations for the environments and life of a specific mission and combines them with the initial tolerances of the parts as procured to produce a worst case part variation database for each mission or project. Applying classical circuit analysis techniques, the analyst can determine if each ci

    9、rcuit and each assembly meets its specified performance attributes over the most extreme but realizable combinations of part variation sources. Technical Rationale: Classical reliability practice is generally associated with minimizing catastrophic failures of parts. Of equal importance, however, is

    10、 assuring that the desired essential mission controls and scientific measurements are made with the intended accuracy, fidelity, and stability. To this end, a uniform, disciplined, systematic approach to performance design verification is essential. Uniformity is achieved by use of a common part var

    11、iation database by all analysts on a specific project. Discipline is achieved by a common analysis containing qualitative and quantitative circuit performance attributes which are traceable to the assembly, subsystem, and system requirements. Also required is a stated or implied level of statistical

    12、 confidence which results from the use of either an EVA (Extreme Value Analysis) or an RSS (Root Sum Squared) approach to the circuit performance variation at some statistical level, usually 2 or 3. Another statistical approach is the Monte Carlo (MC) method of repeated trials with randomly selected

    13、 combinations of part variations. Table 1 compares the relative merits of these three approaches and summarizes the differences in input and output formats and information content. Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-Table of Comparison o

    14、f Advantages/DisadvantegesIt is generally recommended that the EVA be applied as the required method for non-serviceable hardware because of its extreme conservatism. The RSS and MC methods are considered approximately equal to each other if utilized at the same statistical level. Both methods can b

    15、e safely employed for serviceable or recalibrateable equipment, but are considered the lowest level of confidence allowable for non serviceable (i.e. satellites, spacecraft, etc.) hardware. Both the RSS and MC methods should be accepted only as a formal waiver to the EVA process. Any circuit which d

    16、oes not meet its attributes at 3 extremes cannot be considered high reliability in the functional sense. To achieve the project benefits from performing a WCA, the commitment must be mission wide to prevent any “weak links“ in the performance chain. For critical circuitry, preliminary analyses may b

    17、e required to validate a conceptual design approach at Preliminary Design Review (PDR). For maximum benefit, the WCA is typically conducted concurrently with detailed design and completed Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-in advance of,

    18、 and in support of, the Critical Design Review (CDR). Impact of Nonpractice: Early designs of electronic circuits were either empirical or considered initial part tolerances only. This proved to be inadequate in that equipment often failed to remain within specifications at extreme temperatures or o

    19、ver prolonged life. More disciplined approaches followed, but analysts functioning independently were inconsistent in their part variation assumptions. The number of test and field failures fell, but still remained intolerably high, and large systems suffered from inconsistent risk levels. Since WCA

    20、 first came into practice around 1965, its systematic use by a competent circuit designer has been found to increase the probability of the output design passing all WCA criteria. The absence of a structured WCA activity jeopardizes the long term integrity of the initial design. The probability of f

    21、ailing a hardware qualification test and subsequently needing design modifications is greatly increased. Using inherited hardware designs in environments which are different from the original adds an additional degree of jeopardy if there is no documented WCA from which to extrapolate. Reference: 1.

    22、 JPL Publication D 5703, “Reliability Analysis Handbook“, July 1990. Impact of Non-Practice: The absence of a structured WCA activity jeopardizes the long term integrity of the initial design. The probability of failing a hardware qualification test and of subsequently needing design modifications i

    23、s greatly increased.Related Practices: N/A Additional Info: a71 Project: variousProvided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-Approval Info: a71 Approval Date: 2007-10-30a71 Approval Name: ghendersona71 Approval Organization: HQProvided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-


    注意事项

    本文(REG NASA-LLIS-1804--2007 Lessons Learned Design and Analysis of Electronic Circuits for Worst Case Environments and Part Variations.pdf)为本站会员(inwarn120)主动上传,麦多课文档分享仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文档分享(点击联系客服),我们立即给予删除!




    关于我们 - 网站声明 - 网站地图 - 资源地图 - 友情链接 - 网站客服 - 联系我们

    copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
    备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1 

    收起
    展开