欢迎来到麦多课文档分享! | 帮助中心 海量文档,免费浏览,给你所需,享你所想!
麦多课文档分享
全部分类
  • 标准规范>
  • 教学课件>
  • 考试资料>
  • 办公文档>
  • 学术论文>
  • 行业资料>
  • 易语言源码>
  • ImageVerifierCode 换一换
    首页 麦多课文档分享 > 资源分类 > PDF文档下载
    分享到微信 分享到微博 分享到QQ空间

    REG NASA-LLIS-1791-2007 Lessons Learned - Risk Management Managing risk in a risk adverse culture.pdf

    • 资源ID:1019287       资源大小:14.75KB        全文页数:3页
    • 资源格式: PDF        下载积分:10000积分
    快捷下载 游客一键下载
    账号登录下载
    微信登录下载
    二维码
    微信扫一扫登录
    下载资源需要10000积分(如需开发票,请勿充值!)
    邮箱/手机:
    温馨提示:
    如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
    如需开发票,请勿充值!如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
    支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付    微信扫码支付   
    验证码:   换一换

    加入VIP,交流精品资源
     
    账号:
    密码:
    验证码:   换一换
      忘记密码?
        
    友情提示
    2、PDF文件下载后,可能会被浏览器默认打开,此种情况可以点击浏览器菜单,保存网页到桌面,就可以正常下载了。
    3、本站不支持迅雷下载,请使用电脑自带的IE浏览器,或者360浏览器、谷歌浏览器下载即可。
    4、本站资源下载后的文档和图纸-无水印,预览文档经过压缩,下载后原文更清晰。
    5、试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。

    REG NASA-LLIS-1791-2007 Lessons Learned - Risk Management Managing risk in a risk adverse culture.pdf

    1、Lessons Learned Entry: 1791Lesson Info:a71 Lesson Number: 1791a71 Lesson Date: 2007-6-15a71 Submitting Organization: ARCa71 Submitted by: Donald MendozaSubject: Risk Management: Managing risk in a risk adverse culture Abstract: Managing risk in a risk adverse culture is a significant challenge to al

    2、l projects, especially those that are in principle designed to be implemented in a risky environment. Class D missions for example maintain their low cost and short schedules by minimizing the resources devoted to risk reduction. Levying additional risk reduction requirements on a project above thos

    3、e set by the Agency may actually increase a projects overall risk.Description of Driving Event: The Project was aimed at the developing and running a mission which would attempt to confirm either the existence or absence of water ice on one of the moons poles. It was conceived to be a relatively fas

    4、t-paced and low-cost Project coinciding with what is defined as a Class D mission. As such, Agency policy permitted it to be implemented in a minimalist or relatively high risk fashion with respect to the required reviews, oversight, and mission assurance levels it had to satisfy. Unfortunately, not

    5、 all organizations and personnel have a good understanding of Class D mission requirements or Risk Management (RM). Thus, as the Project interfaced with these organizations it experienced a higher than necessary amount of skepticism which manifested into a higher than necessary workload. In particul

    6、ar, the Project was overburdened with reviews and mission assurance requirements that were out of scope for Class D missions.Lesson(s) Learned: 1. As organizations begin to support missions classified outside of what they are accustomed to, they may expect projects to implement inappropriate levels

    7、of safety and mission assurance as a perquisite to their support and/or approval. Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-2. A misunderstanding of risk and RM can lead to an unrealistic environment where an attempt is made to avoid all risk a

    8、t all cost. This approach will over tax what resources a project has such that its primary or most significant risks will be under managed thereby increasing the projects overall risk. Recommendation(s): 1. A projects risk classification and commensurate RM requirements should be highlighted and com

    9、municated throughout its lifecycle such that all its support organizations and stakeholders can have realistic expectations with regard to what to expect from the projects RM processes. This includes expecting an occasional loss as risk management does not mean risk elimination. a. Centers should ha

    10、ve a written RM procedure that details how the Agency requirements will be implemented. This procedure should be consulted whenever requests are made of the project. 2. Centers should establish a training program whereby the Agency and Center RM policies and procedures are taught to its employees. P

    11、articular attention should be given to; a. how specific RM requirements are mapped to each type of project or mission and; b. how the implementation of each requirement can be tailored to the fit within the projects scope. Evidence of Recurrence Control Effectiveness: N/ADocuments Related to Lesson:

    12、 N/AMission Directorate(s): a71 Space Operationsa71 Sciencea71 Exploration Systemsa71 Aeronautics ResearchAdditional Key Phrase(s): a71 Program Management.a71 Safety and Mission Assurance.Additional Info: Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-a71 Project: AllApproval Info: a71 Approval Date: 2008-05-30a71 Approval Name: mbella71 Approval Organization: HQProvided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-


    注意事项

    本文(REG NASA-LLIS-1791-2007 Lessons Learned - Risk Management Managing risk in a risk adverse culture.pdf)为本站会员(medalangle361)主动上传,麦多课文档分享仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文档分享(点击联系客服),我们立即给予删除!




    关于我们 - 网站声明 - 网站地图 - 资源地图 - 友情链接 - 网站客服 - 联系我们

    copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
    备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1 

    收起
    展开