欢迎来到麦多课文档分享! | 帮助中心 海量文档,免费浏览,给你所需,享你所想!
麦多课文档分享
全部分类
  • 标准规范>
  • 教学课件>
  • 考试资料>
  • 办公文档>
  • 学术论文>
  • 行业资料>
  • 易语言源码>
  • ImageVerifierCode 换一换
    首页 麦多课文档分享 > 资源分类 > PDF文档下载
    分享到微信 分享到微博 分享到QQ空间

    REG NASA-LLIS-1395--2004 Lessons Learned Simplified Simulation for Control Validation.pdf

    • 资源ID:1019034       资源大小:15.80KB        全文页数:3页
    • 资源格式: PDF        下载积分:10000积分
    快捷下载 游客一键下载
    账号登录下载
    微信登录下载
    二维码
    微信扫一扫登录
    下载资源需要10000积分(如需开发票,请勿充值!)
    邮箱/手机:
    温馨提示:
    如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
    如需开发票,请勿充值!如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
    支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付    微信扫码支付   
    验证码:   换一换

    加入VIP,交流精品资源
     
    账号:
    密码:
    验证码:   换一换
      忘记密码?
        
    友情提示
    2、PDF文件下载后,可能会被浏览器默认打开,此种情况可以点击浏览器菜单,保存网页到桌面,就可以正常下载了。
    3、本站不支持迅雷下载,请使用电脑自带的IE浏览器,或者360浏览器、谷歌浏览器下载即可。
    4、本站资源下载后的文档和图纸-无水印,预览文档经过压缩,下载后原文更清晰。
    5、试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。

    REG NASA-LLIS-1395--2004 Lessons Learned Simplified Simulation for Control Validation.pdf

    1、Lessons Learned Entry: 1395Lesson Info:a71 Lesson Number: 1395a71 Lesson Date: 2004-04-02a71 Submitting Organization: WSTFa71 Submitted by: Ronald LerdalSubject: Simplified Simulation for Control Validation Abstract: A potentially complex test was innovatively implemented to take advantage of existi

    2、ng capabilities using sound engineering, insight into key test equipment and program capabilities, and successful integration of a sophisticated test article with less than up-to-date equipment and facilities.Description of Driving Event: The WSTF Propulsion Computer Engineering section was given a

    3、task (via Space Act agreement) to develop, validate and implement a very challenging rocket engine control software module for use in initial developmental ground testing operations. This custom control and monitoring software was to be used for safely establishing the closed loop startup and shutdo

    4、wn profiles of a liquid propellant rocket engine with a gas generator powered turbo-pump propellant feed system. There were several critical pressures and turbo-pump vibration parameters that had to be monitored while valves were being cycled to allow safe buildup of gas generator pressure, turbo-pu

    5、mp speed, manifold pressures, and combustion pressure. At any time during the startup or main stage process, if any of these critical parameters deviated from predetermined nominal limits, then a sequence of commands had to be issued for safely shutting down the engine. The design and code generatio

    6、n for the control and limit shutdown algorithms was relatively straight forward, but the challenge was to ensure it would all work correctly prior to firing up a developmental rocket engine for the first time. A process was needed to ensure that the software and hardware involved would correctly res

    7、pond to all critical control parameters. This process had to simulate failures during all stages of operation while providing simulated feedback for the closed loop startup, main stage, and shutdown modes. A rocket engine simulator was required to validate the control system for this one-of-a-kind d

    8、evelopmental engine. This simulator would then have to be implemented in a system that could provide not just mathematical values, but electrical signals for communicating pressure values and vibration monitoring events back to the control system. High Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or

    9、 networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-fidelity modeling of rocket engine processes is very complex and to develop a math model that runs in real-time is even more complex. In previous projects of this type, actual hardware components electronically similar to the rocket engine valves, a

    10、ctuators, and pumps had to be assembled into a crude engine breadboard. All these components then had to be individually connected to the data acquisition and control system for validating the monitor and control algorithms. In addition, time delay relays and signal generators would have to be integ

    11、rated with the breadboard components to provide enough precision for validating the fast, time critical, transient response requirements. The facility where this rocket engine was to be tested already had a programmable logic controller (PLC) in place for controlling some test facility support funct

    12、ions. Although not fast enough to control or provide high fidelity real-time engine simulation it was ideally suited for issuing signals back to the engine control system in response to the control system program output commands. It could also be used to sequence various failure simulation signals f

    13、or validating correct responses to possible engine problems during all stages of operation. The complexity of designing a complete real-time breadboard or math model simulation of the rocket engine was replaced using simpler PLC ladder logic. It was used to provide feedback defined by the engine des

    14、igners for the critical control points in the power up and power down staging process. This in essence allowed using a very simple empirical model of the engine for our validation simulator. It was then also possible to easily inject simulated failures at various critical times to ensure safe operat

    15、ion of all control and emergency shutdown algorithms. This technique could be applied to many dynamic process algorithms on systems that have a few fairly well defined critical control points.Lesson(s) Learned: A combination of technical insight and innovation plus understanding of test article requ

    16、irements together with extensive experience with the test facility and support system can lead to test success at reduced costs.Recommendation(s): When a dynamic process must be simulated, analyze the critical parameters to find discrete points at which control actions must be performed. Then build

    17、a simple empirical model, which may be developed and run on a slower and easier to program and integrate platform such as an industrial PLC. This simplified approach to the validation using hardware and software tools already in the system reduced validation time and costs. Evidence of Recurrence Co

    18、ntrol Effectiveness: N/ADocuments Related to Lesson: Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-NPR 7120.5, NASA Program and Project Management Processes and RequirementsMission Directorate(s): a71 Exploration Systemsa71 Sciencea71 Space Operati

    19、onsa71 Aeronautics ResearchAdditional Key Phrase(s): a71 Administration/Organizationa71 Configuration Managementa71 External Relationsa71 Facilitiesa71 Human Resources & Educationa71 Policy & Planninga71 Procurement Small Business & Industrial Relationsa71 Program and Project Managementa71 Research

    20、& Developmenta71 Risk Management/Assessmenta71 Safety & Mission Assurancea71 Softwarea71 Test & Verificationa71 Test Articlea71 Test FacilityAdditional Info: Approval Info: a71 Approval Date: 2004-04-26a71 Approval Name: Jan Jungewaeltera71 Approval Organization: WSTFa71 Approval Phone Number: 505-524-5161Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-


    注意事项

    本文(REG NASA-LLIS-1395--2004 Lessons Learned Simplified Simulation for Control Validation.pdf)为本站会员(feelhesitate105)主动上传,麦多课文档分享仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文档分享(点击联系客服),我们立即给予删除!




    关于我们 - 网站声明 - 网站地图 - 资源地图 - 友情链接 - 网站客服 - 联系我们

    copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
    备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1 

    收起
    展开