欢迎来到麦多课文档分享! | 帮助中心 海量文档,免费浏览,给你所需,享你所想!
麦多课文档分享
全部分类
  • 标准规范>
  • 教学课件>
  • 考试资料>
  • 办公文档>
  • 学术论文>
  • 行业资料>
  • 易语言源码>
  • ImageVerifierCode 换一换
    首页 麦多课文档分享 > 资源分类 > PDF文档下载
    分享到微信 分享到微博 分享到QQ空间

    REG NASA-LLIS-1195-2002 Lessons Learned Avoid Single String Project Staffing (1998).pdf

    • 资源ID:1018834       资源大小:15.16KB        全文页数:3页
    • 资源格式: PDF        下载积分:10000积分
    快捷下载 游客一键下载
    账号登录下载
    微信登录下载
    二维码
    微信扫一扫登录
    下载资源需要10000积分(如需开发票,请勿充值!)
    邮箱/手机:
    温馨提示:
    如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
    如需开发票,请勿充值!如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
    支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付    微信扫码支付   
    验证码:   换一换

    加入VIP,交流精品资源
     
    账号:
    密码:
    验证码:   换一换
      忘记密码?
        
    友情提示
    2、PDF文件下载后,可能会被浏览器默认打开,此种情况可以点击浏览器菜单,保存网页到桌面,就可以正常下载了。
    3、本站不支持迅雷下载,请使用电脑自带的IE浏览器,或者360浏览器、谷歌浏览器下载即可。
    4、本站资源下载后的文档和图纸-无水印,预览文档经过压缩,下载后原文更清晰。
    5、试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。

    REG NASA-LLIS-1195-2002 Lessons Learned Avoid Single String Project Staffing (1998).pdf

    1、Lessons Learned Entry: 1195Lesson Info:a71 Lesson Number: 1195a71 Lesson Date: 2002-03-14a71 Submitting Organization: JPLa71 Submitted by: David Lehman/David OberhettingerSubject: Avoid “Single String“ Project Staffing (1998) Abstract: Due to tight funding constraint, both the Mars Polar Lander and

    2、Deep Space 1 projects were staffed by lean teams operating with ambitious schedules. For the unsuccessful MPL, many key technical areas were staffed by a single individual with little or no technical backup.Avoid staffing flight projects with individuals having no backups, and provide checks and bal

    3、ances for technical decision-making. Where “single-string” individuals cant be avoided, document decisions, inform peers and management, and track as a risk item.Description of Driving Event: Due to tight funding constraints and a streamlined approach to project development by JPL and their industri

    4、al partners, both the Mars Polar Lander (MPL) and Deep Space 1 (DS1) projects were staffed by lean management and technical teams operating with ambitious schedules.For the unsuccessful MPL, many key technical areas were staffed by a single individual with little or no technical backup. In addition,

    5、 line management review and oversight was minimal compared to prior JPL projects.The DS1 mission was successful well beyond mission objectives. Much of this was due to the extraordinary efforts of the small project team throughout the mission life cycle. However, for many project development and mis

    6、sion operations functions, unique and critical knowledge resided solely in a single individual. Two examples that stand out are: during development, the death of a key project staff member (who had no backup) caused delays in the delivery of crucial hardware, and 2) during operations, the team was s

    7、o small that some members covered multiple ops functions. Any vacation, sick leave, or other absence constituted a serious threat to mission success, particularly in Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-the event of a critical developmenta

    8、l or operations activity or problem.References:1. Report on the Mars Polar Lander and Deep Space 2 Missions, JPL Special Review Board (Casani Report), JPL Document D-18709, 22 March 2000, Section 3.1.1.1.2. “Deep Space 1 Lessons Learned,“ JPL internal presentation, David H. Lehman, December 1, 2000.

    9、3. JPL Corrective Action Notice No. Z69155, Mars Program Investigation Results: “Program/Project Implementation“, 1 May 2000, Recommendation No. 2.Additional Key Words: management and planning, project management, programmatic constraints, risk assessment, technical oversight, workloadLesson(s) Lear

    10、ned: “Single string“ flight project staffing may lead to mission critical oversights, errors, and personnel issues.Recommendation(s): 1. Avoid staffing flight projects with individuals having no backups. During up front planning, build in human redundancy, and provide checks and balances for technic

    11、al decision-making.2. Where it is not feasible to provide for backup personnel on key assignments, ensure that “single-string“ individuals: 1) document and assure accessibility of the rationale for important decisions, and 2) inform peers and line management of these decisions. 3. Report any “single

    12、-string“ staffing approach as a risk item at major project reviews. Identify potential backups anywhere in the organization.Evidence of Recurrence Control Effectiveness: JPL Corrective Action Notice Z69155 has been assigned, and practices will be modified as appropriate.Documents Related to Lesson:

    13、N/AMission Directorate(s): a71 Exploration SystemsProvided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-a71 Sciencea71 Space Operationsa71 Aeronautics ResearchAdditional Key Phrase(s): a71 Flight Equipmenta71 Flight Operationsa71 Ground Equipmenta71 Ground

    14、 Operationsa71 Hardwarea71 Human Factorsa71 Human Resources & Educationa71 Occupational Healtha71 Policy & Planninga71 Safety & Mission Assurancea71 Spacecrafta71 Test & VerificationAdditional Info: Approval Info: a71 Approval Date: 2002-05-06a71 Approval Name: Carol Dumaina71 Approval Organization: JPLa71 Approval Phone Number: 818-354-2776Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-


    注意事项

    本文(REG NASA-LLIS-1195-2002 Lessons Learned Avoid Single String Project Staffing (1998).pdf)为本站会员(livefirmly316)主动上传,麦多课文档分享仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文档分享(点击联系客服),我们立即给予删除!




    关于我们 - 网站声明 - 网站地图 - 资源地图 - 友情链接 - 网站客服 - 联系我们

    copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
    备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1 

    收起
    展开