欢迎来到麦多课文档分享! | 帮助中心 海量文档,免费浏览,给你所需,享你所想!
麦多课文档分享
全部分类
  • 标准规范>
  • 教学课件>
  • 考试资料>
  • 办公文档>
  • 学术论文>
  • 行业资料>
  • 易语言源码>
  • ImageVerifierCode 换一换
    首页 麦多课文档分享 > 资源分类 > PDF文档下载
    分享到微信 分享到微博 分享到QQ空间

    REG NASA-LLIS-0780-2000 Lessons Learned - Pyrotechnic Shock Testing.pdf

    • 资源ID:1018426       资源大小:20.23KB        全文页数:5页
    • 资源格式: PDF        下载积分:10000积分
    快捷下载 游客一键下载
    账号登录下载
    微信登录下载
    二维码
    微信扫一扫登录
    下载资源需要10000积分(如需开发票,请勿充值!)
    邮箱/手机:
    温馨提示:
    如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
    如需开发票,请勿充值!如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
    支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付    微信扫码支付   
    验证码:   换一换

    加入VIP,交流精品资源
     
    账号:
    密码:
    验证码:   换一换
      忘记密码?
        
    友情提示
    2、PDF文件下载后,可能会被浏览器默认打开,此种情况可以点击浏览器菜单,保存网页到桌面,就可以正常下载了。
    3、本站不支持迅雷下载,请使用电脑自带的IE浏览器,或者360浏览器、谷歌浏览器下载即可。
    4、本站资源下载后的文档和图纸-无水印,预览文档经过压缩,下载后原文更清晰。
    5、试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。

    REG NASA-LLIS-0780-2000 Lessons Learned - Pyrotechnic Shock Testing.pdf

    1、Best Practices Entry: Best Practice Info:a71 Committee Approval Date: 2000-04-14a71 Center Point of Contact: JPLa71 Submitted by: Wil HarkinsSubject: Pyrotechnic Shock Testing Practice: Subject potentially sensitive flight assemblies that contain electronic equipment or mechanical devices, as well a

    2、s entire flight systems, to pyrotechnic shock (pyroshock) as part of a development, acceptance, protoflight, or qualification test program. Perform visual inspection and functional verification testing before and after each pyroshock exposure. Where feasible, perform assembly-level and system-level

    3、pyroshock tests with the test article powered and operational to better detect intermittent failures.Abstract: Preferred Practice for Design & Test. Non-practice poses a higher risk of flight failure, particularly for small components near the explosive source. Subject potentially sensitive flight a

    4、ssemblies that contain electronic equipment or mechanical devices, as well as entire flight systems, to pyrotechnic shock (pyroshock) as part of a development, acceptance, protoflight, or qualification test program. Perform visual inspection and functional verification testing before and after each

    5、pyroshock exposure. Where feasible, perform assembly-level and system-level pyroshock tests with the test article powered and operational to better detect intermittent failures.Programs that Certify Usage: This practice has been used on the Mariner series, Viking, Voyager, Galileo and Magellan space

    6、craft.Center to Contact for Information: JPLImplementation Method: Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-This Lesson Learned is based on Reliability Practice number PT-TE-1408A, from NASA Technical Memorandum 4322A, Reliability Preferred Pr

    7、actices for Design and Test.Benefit:Early assembly-level pyroshock testing can often reduce the impacts of design and manufacturing/assembly deficiencies upon program cost and schedule prior to system-level test. Such testing can provide a test margin over flight pyroshock conditions which cannot be

    8、 achieved in system testing. Conversely, system-level shock testing can be used to verify system performance under pyroshock exposure, thus providing increased confidence in mission success and verifying the adequacy of the assembly-level tests.Implementation Method:Pyroshock testing of assemblies m

    9、ay be achieved by using one of the following types of sources:a71 An explosive device Ref. 1,2,a71 Impact of one structural member (e.g., a hammer) upon another (e.g., a beam, plate, shell, or combinations thereof) Ref. 2-5, ora71 A vibration exciter or shaker programmed to generate short duration t

    10、ransient motion Ref. 2,3,6,7.JPL has historically used a shaker, or a beam or plate excited by an explosive device or by hammer-type impact. The test magnitude should include a margin over maximum predicted flight conditions, which at JPL is commonly selected to be equal to 1.5 times the maximum exp

    11、ected flight environment over a frequency range anticipated to encompass the critical resonant frequencies of the test article. This test condition is monitored by accelerometers located at the facility/test article interface. Usually three shocks are specified for qualification testing, or one shoc

    12、k for protoflight, in each of three orthogonal directions. In most cases, the test article is electrically powered and operational, even when no power is to be applied to the hardware during the flight event.For system-level acceptance testing, the actual pyrotechnic or explosive device(s) are commo

    13、nly used, with multiple firings (three at JPL) of the devices that generate the dominant shock environment(s) applied to account for firing-to-firing variations. Power-on testing is normally utilized, with the operational mode applicable to the flight pyro event monitored.Pyroshock tests nearly alwa

    14、ys utilize instrumentation for the purpose of environmental evaluation or test control. Pyroshock measurements are normally made with accelerometers despite some potentially serious deficiencies. Often in the near-field (within 6 in. or 15 cm) and sometimes in the mid-field (within 2 ft or 60 cm) of

    15、 the source, improperly selected accelerometers may break, hard-bottom, or saturate under pyroshock loading, or incorrectly-set signal conditioners may saturate if Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-accelerometer resonances are sufficien

    16、tly excited Ref. 8-10. Such nonlinear responses will usually make the resulting data invalid over the entire spectrum.Once valid signals are acquired, routine data analysis is performed to provide the desired acceleration time histories and shock response spectrum (SRS) Ref. 11. The SRS is utilized

    17、with natural frequencies usually selected to correspond to either 1/3 or 1/6 octave band center frequencies and a constant quality factor selected as Q=10. Assembly-level test control is usually specified to match the desired SRS, with additional limits placed on total shock duration. With impacting

    18、 and explosive shock simulation, this SRS matching is usually performed iteratively with a dynamically similar model. With shaker shock simulation, the SRS matching is performed automatically at low levels, checked at intermediate levels, and then applied at full level.Pyrotechnic shock or pyroshock

    19、 is the transient motion of structural elements, assemblies, subsystems, or systems due to explosive loading induced by the detonation of ordnance devices incorporated into or attached to the structure. Pyroshock is often characterized by its high peak acceleration (300 g- to 300 kg), high frequency

    20、 content (100 Hz to 1 MHZ) and short duration (10 sec to 20 msec), which is largely dependent on the source type and strength, structural type and configuration, and especially the distance from the source to the response point of interest. For aerospace applications, explosive devices are generally

    21、 used to separate structural subsystems (e.g., payloads from launch vehicles), deploy appendages (e.g., solar panels), or activate on-board operational subsystems (e.g., propellant valves) Ref. 1,2. In certain cases, the explosive loading may be accompanied by the release of stored energy due to str

    22、uctural preload. Current spacecraft design often utilizes numerous explosive devices over the course of a mission.JPL has historically utilized most of the available pyrotechnic or explosive devices, which can be divided into two general categories: point sources and line sources. Point sources incl

    23、ude explosive bolts, separation nuts, pin pullers and pushers, bolt and cable cutters, and certain combinations of point sources and operational hardware (e.g., pyrovalves). Line sources include flexible linear shaped charges (FLSCs), mild detonating fuses (MDFs), primer cords, and certain commercia

    24、lly-available products intended to capture explosive and structural debris after separation (e.g., Super-ZipTM). Point and line sources have also been combined: V-band (Marmon) clamps use point explosive sources which may then allow the rapid release of stored strain energy from a structural preload

    25、 acting along a line of contact between the two structures being separated.Because of the high frequency content, many small elements resistant to random vibration are susceptible to pyroshock induced failure. Numerous flight equipment failures have been attributed to pyroshock exposure, some result

    26、ing in catastrophic mission loss Ref. 12-13. Particular examples of pyroshock induced failures include cracks and fracture in crystals, ceramics, epoxies, glass envelopes, solder joints and wire leads, seal failure, migration of contaminating particles, relay and switch chatter and transfer, and def

    27、ormation of very small lightweight structural elements. On the other hand, deformation or failure of major structural elements is rare except in those regions close to the source where structural failure is intended.Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license

    28、 from IHS-,-,-If feasible, assembly-level pyroshock testing should be performed with the test article powered and operational, even when no power is to be applied to the hardware during the flight event, to improve the detection of intermittent failures which might not otherwise be detected until mu

    29、ch later in the test program or in flight. Certain hardware can be expected to malfunction during pyroshock exposure but will resume operation within tolerance after the event.Analytical methods and computational procedures have historically been inapplicable to pyroshock prediction. Thus, pyroshock

    30、 is considered to be an experimental art Ref. 4,5,7.References:1. Kalbfleisch, K.C., “Review of Pyro-Shock Generating Devices and Source Levels“, IES Pyrotechnic Shock Tutorial Program, 31st ATM, Institute of Environmental Sciences, Apr.-May 1985.2. Powers, D.R., “Pyro Shock Test Simulation Methods“

    31、, IES Pyrotechnic Shock Tutorial Program, 31st ATM, Institute of Environmental Sciences, April-May 1985.3. Powers, D.R., “Summary of Testing Techniques“, Shock and Vibration Bulletin, No. 56, Pt. 3, pp 135-142, August 1986.4. Davie, N.T., and Bateman, V.I., “Pyroshock Testing“, Shock and Vibration H

    32、andbook (C.M. Harris, Ed.), 4th ed., Ch. 26, Pt II, McGraw-Hill, NY, 19965. Bateman, V.I., and Davie, N.T., “Recommended Practice for Pyroschock“, Proceedings of the 41st ATM, Institute of Environmental Sciences, pp 208-216, April-May 1995.6. Luhrs, H.N., “Equipment Sensitivity to Pyrotechnic Shock“

    33、, Proceedings of the 22nd ATM, Institute of Environmental Sciences, pp 3-4, April 1976.7. Zimmerman, R.M., “Pyroshock Bibliography“, Proc. 39th ATM, Institute of Environmental Sciences, Vol.2, pp 471-479, May 1993.8. Himelblau, H., Piersol, A.G., Wise, J.H., and Grundvig, M.R., “Handbook for Dynamic

    34、 Data Acquisition and Analysis“, IES-RP-DTE012.1, App. A, Institute of Environmental Sciences, Mt. Prospect, IL, March 1994.9. Piersol, A.G., “Recommendations for the Acquisition and Analysis of Pryoshock Data“, Sound and Vibration, Vol. 26, No.4, pp 18-21, April 199210. Piersol, A.G., “Pyroshock Re

    35、commendations in Proposed MIL-HDBK on Guidelines for Dynamic Data Acquisition and Analysis“, Journal of the Institute of Environmental Sciences, Vol. XXXV, No. 5, pp21-26, Sept-Oct. 1992.11. Ref. 8, Sec. 5.12. Moening, C.J., “Pryotechnic Shock Flight Failures“, IES Pryotechnic Shock Tutorial Program

    36、, 31st ATM, Institute of Environmental Sciences, April-May 1985.13. Moening, C.J., “Views of the World of Pyrotechnic Shock“, Shock and Vibration Bulletin, No. 56, Pt. 3, pp 3-28, August 1986.14. “Powered-On Vibration,“ Reliability Preferred Practice No. PT-TE-1405.Impact of Non-Practice: Provided b

    37、y IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-Nonpractice poses a higher risk of flight failure, particularly for small components near the explosive source.Related Practices: N/AAdditional Info: Approval Info: a71 Approval Date: 2000-04-14a71 Approval Name: Eric Raynora71 Approval Organization: QSa71 Approval Phone Number: 202-358-4738Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-


    注意事项

    本文(REG NASA-LLIS-0780-2000 Lessons Learned - Pyrotechnic Shock Testing.pdf)为本站会员(syndromehi216)主动上传,麦多课文档分享仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文档分享(点击联系客服),我们立即给予删除!




    关于我们 - 网站声明 - 网站地图 - 资源地图 - 友情链接 - 网站客服 - 联系我们

    copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
    备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1 

    收起
    展开