欢迎来到麦多课文档分享! | 帮助中心 海量文档,免费浏览,给你所需,享你所想!
麦多课文档分享
全部分类
  • 标准规范>
  • 教学课件>
  • 考试资料>
  • 办公文档>
  • 学术论文>
  • 行业资料>
  • 易语言源码>
  • ImageVerifierCode 换一换
    首页 麦多课文档分享 > 资源分类 > PDF文档下载
    分享到微信 分享到微博 分享到QQ空间

    REG NACA-RM-L8I08-1948 Longitudinal-stability investigation of high-lift and stall-control devices on a 52 degree sweptback wing with and without fuselage and horizontal tail at a .pdf

    • 资源ID:1017484       资源大小:884.73KB        全文页数:43页
    • 资源格式: PDF        下载积分:10000积分
    快捷下载 游客一键下载
    账号登录下载
    微信登录下载
    二维码
    微信扫一扫登录
    下载资源需要10000积分(如需开发票,请勿充值!)
    邮箱/手机:
    温馨提示:
    如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
    如需开发票,请勿充值!如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
    支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付    微信扫码支付   
    验证码:   换一换

    加入VIP,交流精品资源
     
    账号:
    密码:
    验证码:   换一换
      忘记密码?
        
    友情提示
    2、PDF文件下载后,可能会被浏览器默认打开,此种情况可以点击浏览器菜单,保存网页到桌面,就可以正常下载了。
    3、本站不支持迅雷下载,请使用电脑自带的IE浏览器,或者360浏览器、谷歌浏览器下载即可。
    4、本站资源下载后的文档和图纸-无水印,预览文档经过压缩,下载后原文更清晰。
    5、试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。

    REG NACA-RM-L8I08-1948 Longitudinal-stability investigation of high-lift and stall-control devices on a 52 degree sweptback wing with and without fuselage and horizontal tail at a .pdf

    1、RESEARC.H MEMORANDUM LONGITUDmAL-STABILITY INVESTIGATION OF HIGH-LIFT AMD STALL-CONTROL DEVICES ON A so SWEKTRACK WING WITH AND WITHOUT FUSELAGE AND HORJZONTAL TAIL AT A Gerald V. Foster and James E. Fitspatrick Langley Aeronautical Laboratory Langley Field, Va. NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR AERON

    2、AUTICS Lp! “y captl WASHINGTON ha I L 24 I Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-3 1176 01331 1239 - NACA RM no. a108 NATIONAL ADVISORY C- FOR AERGNAUTICS By Gerald V. Foster and James E. Fitzpatrick I I An investigation has been conducted

    3、in the Langley lg-foot pressure tunnel to determine the separate and cogibined effects of high-lift and stall-control devices, a Rzselage, and the vertical position of a swept- back wing. The wing had an aspect ratio 2.88, taper ratio 0.623, and NACA 641- airfoil sections normal to the 0.282-zhord l

    4、ine. The high- i back horizontal tail on the aerodynamic characteristics of a 52 swept+ z lfft and stall-cantrol devices caneistea of split flaps, 1eading”edge flaps, and upper”eurface fences. These test data were obtained at a Reynolds number of 6.8 X 10 6 which corresponded to a Mach number of 0.1

    5、3. The results of the investigaticm indicate that the increase in maximum lift of the wing with leading-dge and trailing-dge flaps was slightly larger thes the sum of the lfft increments contributed ha- vidually by the flaps. The stability of the wing in the moderate lf+ coefficient range (0.7 to 0.

    6、9) was decreased with leadingedge flaps and beyond this lift-coefficiant range the wing stall spread outboard resultFng in Mther decrease in stability. The tip stall and resulting unstable pitching mnmFlrit. which occurred with leading-edge flapa on the wing were improved wlth upper-+urface fences.

    7、Wpper-eurface fences I edge flaps and split flaps to break in a stable direction at the lift. The horizontal tail increased the stability of the wing-fuselage U combination in the linear lift range; however, the increase in stability decreased as the position of the tail wa8 lowered. In the nonlinea

    8、r I Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-2 NACA RM No. 8108 lift range, the high tail position contributed a destabilizing effect while most configurations indicated an increase in stability with the tail.in the low position. Means of coun

    9、teracting the inherent disadvantages associated with swept-wingwings operating at low speeds are being investigated in the Langley 19-foot-pressure tunnel (references 1 to 4) . As a part of this fnvestigation, tests have been made to determine the longitudinal stability and yaw characteristics at la

    10、rge value6 of Reynolds number- of a meptback wing of aspect ratio 2.88, taper ratio 0.625, and IBACA 641-112 airfoil sections perpendicular to the 0.2824hord line. The longitudinal stability characteristics of the wing with and without- split flaps have been presented in reference 5 anbthe yaw chara

    11、cteristics have been presented in reference 6. The present paper contains the results of the longitudinal stability investigation concerned with the separate ma conibined effects of high- lift and staill-control devices, a fuselage, and the vertical position of a sweptback horizontal tail. The high-

    12、lift and stall-cantrol devices consisted ofsplit flaps, leading+dge flaps, and upper-urfacs- fences. The fuserage was test moment about the quarter chord of mean aerodynamic chord (Momant/qSE) angle of attack of wing chord, degrees wing area, square feet wing span, feet e Provided by IHSNot for Resa

    13、leNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-NACA RM mo. 8108 3 C local chord measured parallel to the plane of symmetry, feet Y spanwise distance from plane of symmetry, feet Q free-stream dpmudc pressure, pounds per square foot P mass density of air, slugs per cubic foot

    14、v free-stream velocity, feet per second 6 effective downwash angle, degrees 4th ratio of effective dynamic preseure at the tail to free- stream d-c pressure it -Incidence of horizontal tail with respect to wing chord .r . plane, degrees h perpendicular distance between the wing chord plane extended

    15、L and the tail 0.25.5 point (Cmith at c, = 0 effectiveness of horizontal tail o.n wing-flwelage combination Mt angulaz difference between the two Incidences of horizontal tail used The general arrangements for the wing equipped with leading-edge flaps, split flaps, upper”eurface fences, fuselage, an

    16、d a horfzontd tail me presented in figures I and 2. The wing however, the complete configurations for the 420 swept- back are more satisfactory because of the greater stability of the wing-fuselage cdinationa. CONCLUDING REMARKS The results of a longitudinal-stability investigation of a 520 sweptbac

    17、k wing tested in various coniblnations with high-lift and I I I I I i Y Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-10 NACA RM No. 8108 sta-control devices, a fuselage, and a sweptback horizontal tail indicate that: 1. The increase in-imum lift o

    18、f the wing attained with leading- edge and trailing+dge flaps in combination WBB slightly larger than the sum of the lift increments contributed individually by the flaps. 2. The addition of leading-edge flaps to the plain wing or to the wing with split flaps caused a decrease in Stabilitg in the mo

    19、derate lift-coefficlent range (0.7 to 0.9). Beyand this lift-coefficient- range the wing”stal1 spreads outboard, resulting in further decrease in stability. 3. Upper-6urface fences with leading-edge flaps delayed the tip stall and produced a stable pitching4noment slope to just balow the maximum lif

    20、t coefficient. Fences caused the pitching+noment curve of the wing with 0.575ppan leading-dge flaps and split flape to break In a stable direction at the maximum lift coefficient. b 4. The fuselage decreased the stability of the stable wing configu- ration; however, it had a negligible effect on the

    21、 unstable wing conf iguratims. 5. The horizontal tail increased the stability of the wing- fuselage combination in the linearlift range; however, the increase in stability decreased.as the position of -the tail wa8 lowered. In the nonlinear lift range, the high tail position contributed a destabiliz

    22、ing effect while most configurations indicated an increase in stability with the tail in the low position. Langley Aeronautical Laboratory National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics Langley Field, Va. Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-

    23、NACA RM No. 8108 REFERENCES sl 1. Graham, Robert R, and Conner, D. William: Lnvestigatian of Hlgh- Lift and Stall-Control Devices on an MACA 6cSeries 42O Sweptback Wing with and without Fuaalage. NACA RM IBo. L7GO9, 1947. 2. Comer, D. William, and meely, Robert E.: Effects of a Fuselage and Various

    24、HigbLift and Stall-Control Flaps on Aerodpmic Characteristics in Pitch of an NACA 6Weries 40 Swept-Back Wing. NACA RM No. 627, 1947. 3. Neely, Robert H., and Koven, .William: LowSpeed Characteristics fn Pitch of a 42O Sweptback Wing with Aspect Ratio 3.9 and Circular- Arc Airfoil Scti013. NACA RM No

    25、. Lm23, 1947. 4. Koven, William, and Graham, Robert R. : Wind-Tunnel Ihvestigation of ELgh-Lift and Stall-Cmtrol Devices M a 37O Sweptback Wing of Aspect Ratio 6 at High Reynold6 Wwnbers. NACA RM Bo. L8D29, 1948. 5. Fitzpatrick, James E., and Foster, Gerald V. : Static Longitudinal Aerodynamic Chara

    26、cteriatics of a 52O Sweptback Wing of Aspect Ratio 2.88 at Reynolds ITumbers from 2,000,000 to U,OOO,OOO. NACA RM No. 8H25, 1948. 6. Sahui, Rein0 J. : Yaw Che;r taper ratio = 0.625; area = 4429 sq in.; E = 39.97 in. AlL dimensions in t Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permi

    27、tted without license from IHS-,-,-. -. (?mr mid-yd low -wing-fuselage comWnation. I a. Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-(a) Front view. Figure 3. - A 520 sweptback wing-fbelage combination in the Langley 19-foot pressure tunnel. Provid

    28、ed by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-. L Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-. . . I f r r (b) Rear view, Figure 3.- Concluded. Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or network

    29、ing permitted without license from IHS-,-,-! Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-4 0 4 8 I? I6 Po 24 28 m 0 -.# ,deg 0 PQI 08 .I2 -16 20 24 28 A? .36 A0 44 48 .5? cm CD . (a) Split flaps off. Figure 4. - Aercdpmic characteristics of a 52O

    30、 sweptback wing with and without leading-edges flaps, i - .- -.- . . . Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-Y “ -4 0 4 8 tP 16 20 24 28 .w 0 -.w io8 Figure 4. - Concluded. 3 Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permit

    31、ted without license from IHS-,-,-mACA RM No. L split flap8 deflected. 2 ! I : I I I I Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-26 MACA RM NO. 8108 (a) Split flaps off. Leading-edge flap s?an Plain wing C.725 b/2 .575 b/2 “ “- 0 2 .4 .6 .B 1.0

    32、1.2 CL (b) Split flaps on. Figure 6. - Variation of aerodynamic center with lift coefficient for a 520 sweptback wing with and without leading- and trailing-edge flaps. f Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-. . -4 0 4 8 I2 I6 .EO P4 28 .0

    33、4 0 -A% -.CM E, dsg 0 .W .08 .I2 .I6 .Po -24 .e8 -32 .36 .40 .44 .48 -5P .56 cm OD Figure 7.- The effect of split flaps and upper-surface fences on the aerodynamic characteristics of a 62O sweptkxk wing with 0.67 b -span leading-edge flaps. 52 Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networki

    34、ng permitted without license from IHS-,-,-. - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -4 0 4 6 I2 16 20 24 28 .w a Yo4 c & .m. .w .ft? J6 .zO .& .p8 ,36 .N # 32 CR Figure 8.- Aerodynamic characteristics of a 520 sweptback wing with upper-surface fences at two spanwise locaioxls. 0,725b -span

    35、 leadin-edge flaps and split flaps OIL z . . . Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-ETACA RM No. 8108 29 c, 0 8 16 24 32 (c 0 8 16 24 32 m ! I I I ! i (a) 0.575b -span leading-edge flaps, (b 0.729 -span leading-edge flap, . .- z fences at. 0.45b 2 - fences at 0. ab z - Figure 9.- Stall studies of 52 sweptback wing in combination with leading-edge flaps and upper-surface fences. Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-


    注意事项

    本文(REG NACA-RM-L8I08-1948 Longitudinal-stability investigation of high-lift and stall-control devices on a 52 degree sweptback wing with and without fuselage and horizontal tail at a .pdf)为本站会员(proposalcash356)主动上传,麦多课文档分享仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文档分享(点击联系客服),我们立即给予删除!




    关于我们 - 网站声明 - 网站地图 - 资源地图 - 友情链接 - 网站客服 - 联系我们

    copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
    备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1 

    收起
    展开